| Package | Affected versions | Patched versions |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser | ≤ 1.11.0all versions | |
| github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 | < 2.63.6 | 2.63.6 |
A low-privileged authenticated user of filebrowser (with create + delete permissions in their own isolated scope) can silently destroy share-link records belonging to any other user — including the administrator — by performing a legitimate DELETE on a file in their own directory whose logical path happens to be a byte-prefix of another user's stored share.Link.Path. The file contents of the victim are not exposed, but the victim's share links are irrevocably wiped.
resourceDeleteHandler in http/resource.go cleans up any share records that reference a deleted file by calling:
// http/resource.go
err = d.store.Share.DeleteWithPathPrefix(file.Path)
file.Path here is the logical path from the URL of the deleting user's request (e.g. /a), not the absolute filesystem path. It is passed as-is to the bolt backend:
// storage/bolt/share.go
func (s shareBackend) DeleteWithPathPrefix(pathPrefix string) error {
var links []share.Link
if err := s.db.Prefix("Path", pathPrefix, &links); err != nil {
return err
}
for _, link := range links {
err = errors.Join(err, s.db.DeleteStruct(&share.Link{Hash: link.Hash}))
}
return err
}
Why the design contradicts this behavior. share.Link carries a UserID field and the application elsewhere treats shares as per-user owned resources. shareDeleteHandler explicitly enforces link.UserID != d.user.ID && !d.user.Perm.Admin → 403. The file-deletion side-effect path is the only location that bypasses this rule.
Running one of these products? Scan your site to see whether it exposes a vulnerable version.
Scan my site free