CVE search
Every published CVE plus open-source advisories (NVD, OSV, GitHub), with CVSS, EPSS and whether it is being exploited in the wild (CISA KEV). Updated every few hours. Our scans match these against the technologies they detect.
Every published CVE plus open-source advisories (NVD, OSV, GitHub), with CVSS, EPSS and whether it is being exploited in the wild (CISA KEV). Updated every few hours. Our scans match these against the technologies they detect.
| 18/12/2020 |
| CVE-2020-26939 | MEDIUM5.3 | In Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC before 1.61 and BC-FJA before 1.0.1.2, attackers can obtain sensitive information about a private exponent because of Observable Differences in Behavior to Error Inputs. This occurs in org.bouncycastle.crypto.encodings.OAEPEncoding. Sending invalid ciphertext that decrypts to a short p | 02/11/2020 |
| CVE-2018-1000180 | HIGH7.5 | Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may have less M-R tests than expected. This appears to be fixed in versions BC 1.60 beta 4 and later, BC-FJA 1 | 05/06/2018 |
| CVE-2016-1000352 | HIGH7.4 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the ECIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider. | 04/06/2018 |
| CVE-2016-1000346 | LOW3.7 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the other party DH public key is not fully validated. This can cause issues as invalid keys can be used to reveal details about the other party's private key where static Diffie-Hellman is in use. As of release 1.56 the key parameters are checked on agreement c | 04/06/2018 |
| CVE-2016-1000345 | MEDIUM5.9 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES/ECIES CBC mode vulnerable to padding oracle attack. For BC 1.55 and older, in an environment where timings can be easily observed, it is possible with enough observations to identify when the decryption is failing due to padding. | 04/06/2018 |
| CVE-2016-1000344 | HIGH7.4 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider. | 04/06/2018 |
| CVE-2016-1000343 | HIGH7.5 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA key pair generator generates a weak private key if used with default values. If the JCA key pair generator is not explicitly initialised with DSA parameters, 1.55 and earlier generates a private value assuming a 1024 bit key size. In earlier releases th | 04/06/2018 |
| CVE-2016-1000342 | HIGH7.5 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a sign | 04/06/2018 |
| CVE-2016-1000341 | MEDIUM5.9 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier DSA signature generation is vulnerable to timing attack. Where timings can be closely observed for the generation of signatures, the lack of blinding in 1.55, or earlier, may allow an attacker to gain information about the signature's k value and ultimately the | 04/06/2018 |
| CVE-2016-1000340 | HIGH7.5 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider versions 1.51 to 1.55, a carry propagation bug was introduced in the implementation of squaring for several raw math classes have been fixed (org.bouncycastle.math.raw.Nat???). These classes are used by our custom elliptic curve implementations (org.bouncycastle.math.ec.custom.**), so | 04/06/2018 |
| CVE-2016-1000339 | MEDIUM5.3 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the primary engine class used for AES was AESFastEngine. Due to the highly table driven approach used in the algorithm it turns out that if the data channel on the CPU can be monitored the lookup table accesses are sufficient to leak information on the AES key | 04/06/2018 |
| CVE-2016-1000338 | HIGH7.5 | In Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a signed | 01/06/2018 |
| CVE-2015-7940 | MEDIUM5.0 | The Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.51 does not validate a point is withing the elliptic curve, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private keys via a series of crafted elliptic curve Diffie Hellman (ECDH) key exchanges, aka an "invalid curve attack." | 09/11/2015 |