| Package | Affected versions | Patched versions |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/traefik/traefik | ≤ 1.7.34all versions | |
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 | ≤ 2.11.40all versions | |
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 | < 3.6.10 | 3.6.10 |
| traefik | < 3.6.10 | 3.6.10 |
There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik's Kubernetes Gateway provider related to rule injection.
A tenant with write access to an HTTPRoute resource can inject backtick-delimited rule tokens into Traefik's router rule language via unsanitized header or query parameter match values. In shared gateway deployments, this can bypass listener hostname constraints and redirect traffic for victim hostnames to attacker-controlled backends.
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.
<details> <summary>Original Description</summary>hey Traefik,
repo: https://github.com/traefik/traefik commit: a4a91344edcdd6276c1b766ca19ee3f0e346480f (as-of 2026-03-02)
traefik's kubernetes gateway provider builds router rules by interpolating HTTPRoute match values into the traefik rule language using backtick-delimited string literals (e.g., Header(name,value), Query(name,value)) without escaping or validation.
because backtick is a delimiter in the rule language, a tenant-controlled backtick can terminate the literal and inject additional rule tokens (for example ) || HostRegexp(.*) || ...). this changes the parsed ast so that an injected OR branch is not gated by the intended Host(...) constraint due to operator precedence, and can result in end-to-end routing hijack (victim host routed to attacker backends).
in shared gateway deployments that rely on gateway API listener hostname constraints to isolate tenants, this can enable cross-tenant routing hijack to attacker-controlled backends.
expected: provider-generated rules must be injection-safe; tenant-controlled match values must not be able to change the rule parse tree beyond literal argument content, especially across listener hostname-constraint boundaries in shared gateway deployments.
actual: a backtick inside a header/query match value can inject an OR branch into the generated rule, changing the ast root from and to or and enabling hostname-constraint bypass.
HIGH (impact ceiling may reach the top severity tier in shared gateway threat models; end-to-end kubernetes reproduction is recommended to demonstrate cross-tenant routing impact).
</details>Running one of these products? Scan your site to see whether it exposes a vulnerable version.
Scan my site freeCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N = 8.7
cwe: CWE-74 (improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component)
pkg/provider/kubernetes/gateway/httproute.go: buildHeaderRules and buildQueryParamRules build Header(%s,%s) / Query(%s,%s) without escapingpkg/provider/kubernetes/gateway/grpcroute.go: buildGRPCHeaderRules builds Header(%s,%s) / HeaderRegexp(%s,%s) without escapingpkg/provider/kubernetes/knative/kubernetes.go: buildRule builds Header(%s,%s) without escapingpkg/muxer/http/parser.go (predicate-based rule parser)the kubernetes gateway provider formats rule strings using backticks as string delimiters:
rules = append(rules, fmt.Sprintf("Header(`%s`,`%s`)", header.Name, header.Value))
rules = append(rules, fmt.Sprintf("Query(`%s`,`%s`)", qp.Name, qp.Value))
if header.Value (or qp.Value) contains a backtick and operator tokens, it can terminate the literal and inject additional rule-language tokens, changing the parse tree.
attacker-controlled input is the kubernetes control plane object HTTPRoute in a tenant namespace. the attacker controls:
HTTPRoute.Spec.Rules[].Matches[].Headers[].Value and/or QueryParams[].Value (string)in shared gateway setups, this can bypass gateway API listener hostname constraints, causing requests for victim hostnames to be routed to attacker backends. downstream effects can include credential/token capture and request forgery, depending on the workload behind the gateway.
traefik's documentation frames gateway API as providing safer multi-tenant primitives via listener constraints (see https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/security/multi-tenant-kubernetes/). rule injection breaks those constraints when they are relied upon as a boundary.
attachment includes poc.zip with an integration PoC that:
or and routes victim.com to the attacker handler (emits [PROOF_MARKER])%q) where the ast root remains and and routes victim.com to the victim handler (emits [NC_MARKER])run canonical:
unzip poc.zip -d poc
cd poc
make canonical
canonical output excerpt:
[CALLSITE_HIT]
[PROOF_MARKER]
run control:
unzip poc.zip -d poc
cd poc
make control
control output excerpt:
[NC_MARKER]
encode rule arguments using injection-safe quoting (for example fmt.Sprintf("Header(%q,%q)", name, value)), or otherwise reject/escape backticks and other rule-language metacharacters before interpolation. add regression tests that include backticks and operator tokens inside header/query match values and assert they cannot change the parse tree.
fix accepted when: tenant-controlled HTTPRoute match values cannot inject operators into the generated rule string and cannot change the resulting parsed ast structure.
[poc.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698814/poc.zip) [PR_DESCRIPTION.md](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698815/PR_DESCRIPTION.md) [attack_scenario.md](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25698816/attack_scenario.md)
cheers, Oleh Konko