| Package | Affected versions | Patched versions |
|---|---|---|
| vyper | ≥ 0.3.8, < 0.4.0≥ 0.3.8, < 0.4.0b1 | 0.4.00.4.0b1 |
| vyper | = 0.4.0≥ 0.3.8, ≤ 0.3.10 |
When looping over a range of the form range(start, start + N), if start is negative, the execution will always revert.
This issue is caused by an incorrect assertion inserted by the code generation of the range (stmt.parse_For_range()):
This assertion was introduced in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/3de1415ee77a9244eb04bdb695e249d3ec9ed868 to fix https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6r8q-pfpv-7cgj. The issue arises when start is signed, instead of using sle, le is used and start is interpreted as an unsigned integer for the comparison. If it is a negative number, its 255th bit is set to 1 and is hence interpreted as a very large unsigned integer making the assertion always fail.
@external
def foo():
x:int256 = min_value(int256)
# revert when it should not since we have the following assertion that fails:
# [assert, [le, min_value(int256), max_value(int256) + 1 - 10]],
for i in range(x, x + 10):
pass
patched in v0.4.0, specifically, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3679 disallows this form of range().
Any contract having a range(start, start + N) where start is a signed integer with the possibility for start to be negative is affected. If a call goes through the loop while supplying a negative start the execution will revert.
Running one of these products? Scan your site to see whether it exposes a vulnerable version.
Scan my site free