| Package | Affected versions | Patched versions |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/cloudnativelabs/kube-router/v2 | ≥ 2.7.0, ≤ 2.8.0 |
When kube-router is configured with per-node BGP peer passwords using the kube-router.io/peer.passwords node annotation, and verbose logging is enabled (--v=2 or higher), the raw Kubernetes node annotation map is logged verbatim — including the base64-encoded BGP MD5 passwords. Anyone with access to kube-router's logs (via kubectl logs, log aggregation systems, or shared log dumps during debugging) can extract and decode the BGP peer passwords. The official troubleshooting documentation instructs users to collect logs at -v=2 before filing issues, making accidental disclosure during support interactions a realistic scenario.
The vulnerability is at pkg/controllers/routing/network_routes_controller.go:1129:
// pkg/controllers/routing/network_routes_controller.go:1127-1133
// If the global routing peer is configured then peer with it
// else attempt to get peers from node specific BGP annotations.
if len(nrc.globalPeerRouters) == 0 {
klog.V(2).Infof("Attempting to construct peer configs from annotation: %+v", node.Annotations)
peerCfgs, err := bgpPeerConfigsFromAnnotations(
node.Annotations is of type map[string]string. This type does not implement fmt.Stringer, so %+v formatting dumps every key-value pair verbatim. When kube-router.io/peer.passwords is set on the node (the documented mechanism for providing per-node BGP MD5 passwords), its base64-encoded value appears in the log output.
The BGP peer password annotation is documented in docs/user-guide.md and has the constant:
// pkg/controllers/routing/network_routes_controller.go:59
peerPasswordAnnotation = "kube-router.io/peer.passwords"
Note that a password-safe String() method exists on PeerConfig and PeerConfigs in pkg/bgp/peer_config.go and is tested:
// pkg/bgp/peer_config.go:63-79
// Custom Stringer to prevent leaking passwords when printed
func (p PeerConfig) String() string {
// ...password field is intentionally omitted...
}
However, this protective method is never invoked by the vulnerable log statement, which dumps the raw annotation map before any parsing occurs. The password masking only applies after the annotation is parsed into PeerConfig structs.
The second log statement at line 1510 (klog.Infof("Peer config from %s annotation: %+v", peersAnnotation, peerConfigs)) is not vulnerable — peerConfigs is of type bgp.PeerConfigs which implements and correctly masks passwords.
Running one of these products? Scan your site to see whether it exposes a vulnerable version.
Scan my site freefmt.StringerThe vulnerable path (bgpPeerConfigsFromIndividualAnnotations) is triggered when the kube-router.io/peers consolidated YAML annotation is not set — i.e., when operators use the older individual annotation format (kube-router.io/peer.ips, kube-router.io/peer.asns, kube-router.io/peer.passwords). This older format remains fully supported and documented.
Setup: Node has per-node BGP peer annotations including a password:
kubectl annotate node worker-1 \
kube-router.io/peer.ips=192.0.2.1 \
kube-router.io/peer.asns=65001 \
"kube-router.io/peer.passwords=$(echo -n 's3cr3t-bgp-p@ss' | base64)"
Trigger: Start kube-router with verbose logging (e.g., following troubleshooting documentation):
# As documented in docs/troubleshoot.md for debugging:
kube-router ... --v=2
Observe: In kube-router pod logs:
I0318 10:23:41.123456 1 network_routes_controller.go:1129] Attempting to construct peer configs from annotation:
map[
kube-router.io/peer.asns:65001
kube-router.io/peer.ips:192.0.2.1
kube-router.io/peer.passwords:czNjcjN0LWJncC1wQHNz <-- base64-encoded password
...other annotations...
]
Decode the password:
echo "czNjcjN0LWJncC1wQHNz" | base64 -d
# Output: s3cr3t-bgp-p@ss
Impact: With the decoded password and network adjacency to the BGP peer, an attacker can establish an unauthorized BGP session, inject routes, or disrupt legitimate BGP peering.
--v=2 logs before filing issues, creating a realistic path for passwords to be shared in bug reports or support ticketsRemove or redact the vulnerable log statement at line 1129. The diagnostic information it provides (confirming that annotation-based peer configuration is being used) can be conveyed without exposing credential values:
// Before (vulnerable):
klog.V(2).Infof("Attempting to construct peer configs from annotation: %+v", node.Annotations)
// After (safe):
klog.V(2).Infof("Attempting to construct peer configs from per-node annotations (kube-router.io/peer.ips, etc.)")
If full annotation content is needed for debugging (e.g., to show non-sensitive annotations), log a filtered version that explicitly excludes the password annotation:
// Safe alternative that preserves non-sensitive diagnostic info:
safeAnnotations := make(map[string]string)
for k, v := range node.Annotations {
if k != peerPasswordAnnotation {
safeAnnotations[k] = v
}
}
klog.V(2).Infof("Attempting to construct peer configs from annotations: %+v", safeAnnotations)