CVE search
Every published CVE plus open-source advisories (NVD, OSV, GitHub), with CVSS, EPSS and whether it is being exploited in the wild (CISA KEV). Updated every few hours. Our scans match these against the technologies they detect.
Every published CVE plus open-source advisories (NVD, OSV, GitHub), with CVSS, EPSS and whether it is being exploited in the wild (CISA KEV). Updated every few hours. Our scans match these against the technologies they detect.
| 02/07/2025 |
| CVE-2025-31478 | 높음8.2 | Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. Zulip supports a configuration where account creation is limited solely by being able to authenticate with a single-sign on authentication backend, meaning the organization places no restrictions on email address domains or invitations being required to join, but has dis | 16/04/2025 |
| CVE-2025-30369 | 낮음2.7 | Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. The API for deleting an organization custom profile field is supposed to be restricted to organization administrators, but its handler failed to check that the field belongs to the same organization as the user. Therefore, an administrator of any organization was incorre | 31/03/2025 |
| CVE-2025-27149 | 낮음2.7 | Zulip server provides an open-source team chat that helps teams stay productive and focused. Prior to 10.0, the data export to organization administrators feature in Zulip leaks private data. The collection of user-agent types identifying specific integrations or HTTP libraries (E.g., ZulipGitlabWebhook, okhttp, or Pyc | 31/03/2025 |
| CVE-2024-56136 | 보통5.3 | Zulip server provides an open-source team chat that helps teams stay productive and focused. Zulip Server 7.0 and above are vulnerable to an information disclose attack, where, if a Zulip server is hosting multiple organizations, an unauthenticated user can make a request and determine if an email address is in use by | 16/01/2025 |
| CVE-2024-36612 | 높음7.5 | Zulip from 8.0 to 8.3 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the handling of popovers. | 29/11/2024 |
| CVE-2024-27286 | 보통6.5 | Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. When a user moves a Zulip message, they have the option to move all messages in the topic, move only subsequent messages as well, or move just a single message. If the user chose to just move one message, and was moving it from a public stream to a private stream, Zulip | 20/03/2024 |
| CVE-2024-21630 | 보통4.3 | Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. A vulnerability in version 8.0 is similar to CVE-2023-32677, but applies to multi-use invitations, not single-use invitation links as in the prior CVE. Specifically, it applies when the installation has configured non-admins to be able to invite users and create multi-us | 25/01/2024 |
| CVE-2023-47642 | 보통4.3 | Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. It was discovered by the Zulip development team that active users who had previously been subscribed to a stream incorrectly continued being able to use the Zulip API to access metadata for that stream. As a result, users who had been removed from a stream, but still had | 16/11/2023 |
| CVE-2023-32678 | 보통6.5 | Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool with topic-based threading that combines email and chat. Users who used to be subscribed to a private stream and have been removed from it since retain the ability to edit messages/topics, move messages to other streams, and delete messages that they used to have access t | 25/08/2023 |
| CVE-2023-33186 | 보통6.1 | Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool with unique topic-based threading that combines the best of email and chat to make remote work productive and delightful. The main development branch of Zulip Server from May 2, 2023 and later, including beta versions 7.0-beta1 and 7.0-beta2, is vulnerable to a cross-site | 30/05/2023 |
| CVE-2023-22735 | 보통4.6 | Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. In versions of zulip prior to commit `2f6c5a8` but after commit `04cf68b` users could upload files with arbitrary `Content-Type` which would be served from the Zulip hostname with `Content-Disposition: inline` and no `Content-Security-Policy` header, allowing them to tri | 07/02/2023 |
| CVE-2022-41914 | 낮음3.7 | Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. For organizations with System for Cross-domain Identity Management(SCIM) account management enabled, Zulip Server 5.0 through 5.6 checked the SCIM bearer token using a comparator that did not run in constant time. Therefore, it might theoretically be possible for an atta | 16/11/2022 |
| CVE-2022-31134 | 보통4.9 | Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. Zulip Server versions 2.1.0 above have a user interface tool, accessible only to server owners and server administrators, which provides a way to download a "public data" export. While this export is only accessible to administrators, in many configurations server admini | 12/07/2022 |
| CVE-2022-23656 | 보통5.4 | Zulip is an open source team chat app. The `main` development branch of Zulip Server from June 2021 and later is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting vulnerability on the recent topics page. An attacker could maliciously craft a full name for their account and send messages to a topic with several participants; a victi | 02/03/2022 |
| CVE-2022-21706 | 심각9.8 | Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool with topic-based threading. Zulip Server version 2.0.0 and above are vulnerable to insufficient access control with multi-use invitations. A Zulip Server deployment which hosts multiple organizations is vulnerable to an attack where an invitation created in one organizati | 26/02/2022 |
| CVE-2021-30487 | 낮음2.7 | In the topic moving API in Zulip Server 3.x before 3.4, organization administrators were able to move messages to streams in other organizations hosted by the same Zulip installation. | 15/04/2021 |
| CVE-2021-30479 | 보통5.3 | An issue was discovered in Zulip Server before 3.4. A bug in the implementation of the all_public_streams API feature resulted in guest users being able to receive message traffic to public streams that should have been only accessible to members of the organization. | 15/04/2021 |