CVE search
Every published CVE plus open-source advisories (NVD, OSV, GitHub), with CVSS, EPSS and whether it is being exploited in the wild (CISA KEV). Updated every few hours. Our scans match these against the technologies they detect.
Every published CVE plus open-source advisories (NVD, OSV, GitHub), with CVSS, EPSS and whether it is being exploited in the wild (CISA KEV). Updated every few hours. Our scans match these against the technologies they detect.
| 14/07/2021 |
| CVE-2021-3336 | 高危8.1 | DoTls13CertificateVerify in tls13.c in wolfSSL before 4.7.0 does not cease processing for certain anomalous peer behavior (sending an ED22519, ED448, ECC, or RSA signature without the corresponding certificate). The client side is affected because man-in-the-middle attackers can impersonate TLS 1.3 servers. | 29/01/2021 |
| CVE-2020-36177 | 严重9.8 | RsaPad_PSS in wolfcrypt/src/rsa.c in wolfSSL before 4.6.0 has an out-of-bounds write for certain relationships between key size and digest size. | 06/01/2021 |
| CVE-2020-24613 | 中危6.8 | wolfSSL before 4.5.0 mishandles TLS 1.3 server data in the WAIT_CERT_CR state, within SanityCheckTls13MsgReceived() in tls13.c. This is an incorrect implementation of the TLS 1.3 client state machine. This allows attackers in a privileged network position to completely impersonate any TLS 1.3 servers, and read or modif | 24/08/2020 |
| CVE-2020-24585 | 中危5.3 | An issue was discovered in the DTLS handshake implementation in wolfSSL before 4.5.0. Clear DTLS application_data messages in epoch 0 do not produce an out-of-order error. Instead, these messages are returned to the application. | 21/08/2020 |
| CVE-2020-15309 | 高危7.0 | An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 4.5.0, when single precision is not employed. Local attackers can conduct a cache-timing attack against public key operations. These attackers may already have obtained sensitive information if the affected system has been used for private key operations (e.g., signing with a p | 21/08/2020 |
| CVE-2020-12457 | 高危7.5 | An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 4.5.0. It mishandles the change_cipher_spec (CCS) message processing logic for TLS 1.3. If an attacker sends ChangeCipherSpec messages in a crafted way involving more than one in a row, the server becomes stuck in the ProcessReply() loop, i.e., a denial of service. | 21/08/2020 |
| CVE-2020-11735 | 中危5.3 | The private-key operations in ecc.c in wolfSSL before 4.4.0 do not use a constant-time modular inverse when mapping to affine coordinates, aka a "projective coordinates leak." | 25/06/2020 |
| CVE-2020-11713 | 高危7.5 | wolfSSL 4.3.0 has mulmod code in wc_ecc_mulmod_ex in ecc.c that does not properly resist timing side-channel attacks. | 12/04/2020 |
| CVE-2014-2898 | 严重9.8 | wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.9.4 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via multiple calls to the CyaSSL_read function which triggers an out-of-bounds read when an error occurs, related to not checking the return code and MAC verification failure. | 28/01/2020 |
| CVE-2014-2897 | 严重9.8 | The SSL 3 HMAC functionality in wolfSSL CyaSSL 2.5.0 before 2.9.4 does not check the padding length when verification fails, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted HMAC, which triggers an out-of-bounds read. | 28/01/2020 |
| CVE-2014-2896 | 严重9.8 | The DoAlert function in the (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.9.4 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact and vectors, which trigger memory corruption or an out-of-bounds read. | 28/01/2020 |
| CVE-2019-19963 | 中危5.3 | An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 4.3.0 in a non-default configuration where DSA is enabled. DSA signing uses the BEEA algorithm during modular inversion of the nonce, leading to a side-channel attack against the nonce. | 25/12/2019 |
| CVE-2019-19962 | 高危7.5 | wolfSSL before 4.3.0 mishandles calls to wc_SignatureGenerateHash, leading to fault injection in RSA cryptography. | 25/12/2019 |
| CVE-2019-19960 | 中危5.3 | In wolfSSL before 4.3.0, wc_ecc_mulmod_ex does not properly resist side-channel attacks. | 25/12/2019 |
| CVE-2019-14317 | 中危5.3 | wolfSSL and wolfCrypt 4.1.0 and earlier (formerly known as CyaSSL) generate biased DSA nonces. This allows a remote attacker to compute the long term private key from several hundred DSA signatures via a lattice attack. The issue occurs because dsa.c fixes two bits of the generated nonces. | 11/12/2019 |
| CVE-2014-2904 | 高危7.5 | wolfssl before 3.2.0 has a server certificate that is not properly authorized for server authentication. | 21/11/2019 |