CVE 検索
公開されているすべての CVE とオープンソースのセキュリティアドバイザリ（NVD、OSV、GitHub）を、CVSS、EPSS、実際に悪用されているか（CISA KEV）とともに掲載しています。数時間ごとに更新されます。スキャンでは、検出した技術とこれらを照合します。
公開されているすべての CVE とオープンソースのセキュリティアドバイザリ（NVD、OSV、GitHub）を、CVSS、EPSS、実際に悪用されているか（CISA KEV）とともに掲載しています。数時間ごとに更新されます。スキャンでは、検出した技術とこれらを照合します。
| 26/03/2026 |
| CVE-2026-33343 | 中6.5 | etcd is a distributed key-value store for the data of a distributed system. Prior to versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9, an authenticated user with RBAC restricted permissions on key ranges can use nested transactions to bypass all key-level authorization. This allows any authenticated user with direct access to etcd t | 26/03/2026 |
| CVE-2022-34038 | 高7.5 | Etcd v3.5.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via function PageWriter.write in pagewriter.go. NOTE: the vendor's position is that this is not a vulnerability. | 22/08/2023 |
| CVE-2023-32082 | 中4.3 | etcd is a distributed key-value store for the data of a distributed system. Prior to versions 3.4.26 and 3.5.9, the LeaseTimeToLive API allows access to key names (not value) associated to a lease when `Keys` parameter is true, even a user doesn't have read permission to the keys. The impact is limited to a cluster whi | 11/05/2023 |
| CVE-2021-28235 | 緊急9.8 | Authentication vulnerability found in Etcd-io v.3.4.10 allows remote attackers to escalate privileges via the debug function. | 04/04/2023 |
| CVE-2020-15113 | 高7.1 | In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, certain directory paths are created (etcd data directory and the directory path when provided to automatically generate self-signed certificates for TLS connections with clients) with restricted access permissions (700) by using the os.MkdirAll. This function does not perform | 05/08/2020 |
| CVE-2020-15112 | 中6.5 | In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the | 05/08/2020 |
| CVE-2020-15106 | 中6.5 | In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, a large slice causes panic in decodeRecord method. The size of a record is stored in the length field of a WAL file and no additional validation is done on this data. Therefore, it is possible to forge an extremely large frame size that can unintentionally panic at the expense | 05/08/2020 |
| CVE-2018-16886 | 高8.1 | etcd versions 3.2.x before 3.2.26 and 3.3.x before 3.3.11 are vulnerable to an improper authentication issue when role-based access control (RBAC) is used and client-cert-auth is enabled. If an etcd client server TLS certificate contains a Common Name (CN) which matches a valid RBAC username, a remote attacker may auth | 14/01/2019 |