Tóm tắt nhanh
- CVE-2020-26243 là lỗ hổng mức CAO (CVSS 7.5) ảnh hưởng nanopb, nanopb (nanopb project).
- Xác suất bị khai thác trong 30 ngày tới (EPSS): 2.7%, cao hơn 85.8% các lỗ hổng khác.
- Cách xử lý: cập nhật lên 0.3.9.7, 0.4.4 hoặc mới hơn.
| Gói / sản phẩm | Phiên bản bị ảnh hưởng | Phiên bản đã vá |
|---|
| nanopb PyPI | ≥ 0.3.2, < 0.3.9.7≥ 0.4.0, < 0.4.4
| 0.3.9.70.4.4
|
| nanopb | ≥ 0.4.0, < 0.4.4< 0.3.9.7
| 0.4.40.3.9.7
|
Mô tả
Impact
Decoding specifically formed message can leak memory if dynamic allocation is enabled and an oneof field contains a static submessage that contains a dynamic field, and the message being decoded contains the submessage multiple times. This is rare in normal messages, but it is a concern when untrusted data is parsed.
Patches
Preliminary patch is available on git and problem will be patched in versions 0.3.9.7 and 0.4.4 once testing has been completed.
Workarounds
Following workarounds are available:
- Set the option
no_unions for the oneof field. This will generate fields as separate instead of C union, and avoids triggering the problematic code.
- Set the type of the submessage field inside oneof to
FT_POINTER. This way the whole submessage will be dynamically allocated and the problematic code is not executed.
- Use an arena allocator for nanopb, to make sure all memory can be released afterwards.
References
Bug report: https://github.com/nanopb/nanopb/issues/615
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, comment on the bug report linked above.
Mô tả của NVD
Nanopb is a small code-size Protocol Buffers implementation. In Nanopb before versions 0.4.4 and 0.3.9.7, decoding specifically formed message can leak memory if dynamic allocation is enabled and an oneof field contains a static submessage that contains a dynamic field, and the message being decoded contains the submessage multiple times. This is rare in normal messages, but it is a concern when untrusted data is parsed. This is fixed in versions 0.3.9.7 and 0.4.4. The following workarounds are available: 1) Set the option `no_unions` for the oneof field. This will generate fields as separate instead of C union, and avoids triggering the problematic code. 2) Set the type of the submessage field inside oneof to `FT_POINTER`. This way the whole submessage will be dynamically allocated and the problematic code is not executed. 3) Use an arena allocator for nanopb, to make sure all memory can be released afterwards.
Bạn đang dùng một trong các sản phẩm này? Quét site để biết có đang lộ phiên bản có lỗ hổng không.
Quét site miễn phí