| Gói / sản phẩm | Phiên bản bị ảnh hưởng | Phiên bản đã vá |
|---|---|---|
| hemmelig | < 7.3.3 | 7.3.3 |
| hemmelig | < 7.3.3 | 7.3.3 |
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) filter bypass vulnerability exists in the webhook URL validation of the Secret Requests feature. The application attempts to block internal/private IP addresses but can be bypassed using DNS rebinding (e.g., localtest.me which resolves to 127.0.0.1) or open redirect services (e.g., httpbin.org/redirect-to). This allows an authenticated user to make the server initiate HTTP requests to internal network resources.
The vulnerability exists in the isPublicUrl function located in /api/lib/utils.ts. The function validates webhook URLs against a blocklist of private IP patterns:
export const isPublicUrl = (url: string): boolean => {
const parsed = new URL(url);
const hostname = parsed.hostname.toLowerCase();
const blockedPatterns = [
/^localhost$/,
/^127\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}$/,
/^192\.168\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}$/,
// ... other patterns
];
return !blockedPatterns.some((pattern) => pattern.test(hostname));
};
The validation is flawed because:
DNS Rebinding Bypass: It only checks the hostname string, not the resolved IP address. Domains like localtest.me pass validation (not matching any blocked pattern) but resolve to 127.0.0.1.
Open Redirect Bypass: External URLs like httpbin.org/redirect-to?url=http://127.0.0.1 pass validation since httpbin.org is a public domain. When the server follows the redirect, it connects to the internal address.
Optional: On the container that runs Hemmelig application, host a temporary port with the following command:
node -e "require('http').createServer((req,res)=>{console.log(req.method,req.url,req.headers);res.end('ok')}).listen(8080,()=>console.log('Listening on 8080'))"
Secret Requests tab and create a new requestWebhook URL input to bypass SSRF1. Using domain redirect: http://localtest.me:PORT
2. Using httpbin to perform a redirect: httpbin.org/redirect-to?url=http://127.0.0.1:PORT
Otherwise, if the port doesn't exist, a similar error in the logs can be found:
Secret request webhook delivery failed after retries: TypeError: fetch failed
at node:internal/deps/undici/undici:15845:13
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:103:5)
at async sendSecretRequestWebhook (/app/api/routes/secret-requests.ts:58:34) {
[cause]: Error: connect ECONNREFUSED 127.0.0.1:80
at TCPConnectWrap.afterConnect [as oncomplete] (node:net:1637:16) {
errno: -111,
code: 'ECONNREFUSED',
syscall: 'connect',
address: '127.0.0.1',
port: 80
}
}
While the SSRF filter can be bypassed, the practical impact is limited because this is a Blind SSRF, there is no response reflected. But with certain technique like response-timing, the attackers can still indicate whether or not a port is opened.
Replace hostname-based validation with IP resolution checking:
import { isIP } from 'is-ip';
import dns from 'dns/promises';
export const isPublicUrl = async (url: string): Promise<boolean> => {
const parsed = new URL(url);
const hostname = parsed.hostname;
// Resolve hostname to IP
let addresses: string[];
try {
if (isIP(hostname)) {
addresses = [hostname];
} else {
addresses = await dns.resolve4(hostname).catch(() => []);
const ipv6 = await dns.resolve6(hostname).catch(() => []);
addresses = [...addresses, ...ipv6];
}
} catch {
return false;
}
// Check resolved IPs against blocklist
const privateRanges = [
/^127\./,
/^10\./,
/^192\.168\./,
/^172\.(1[6-9]|2\d|3[0-1])\./,
/^169\.254\./,
/^::1$/,
/^fe80:/i,
/^fc00:/i,
/^fd/i,
];
return addresses.length > 0 && !addresses.some(ip =>
privateRanges.some(pattern => pattern.test(ip))
);
};
Additionally, disable following redirects in the webhook fetch call or re-validate the URL after each redirect.
Bạn đang dùng một trong các sản phẩm này? Quét site để biết có đang lộ phiên bản có lỗ hổng không.
Quét site miễn phí