| Gói / sản phẩm | Phiên bản bị ảnh hưởng | Phiên bản đã vá |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/xuri/excelize/v2 | ≥ 2.8.1, < 2.11.1-0.20260911060113-ea12859e43c6 | 2.11.1-0.20260911060113-ea12859e43c6 |
| excelize | ≥ 2.8.1, ≤ 2.11.0 |
ANCHORARRAY (calc.go:15137 on current master) evaluates each cell of the referenced spill range by calling the exported CalcCellValue, which unconditionally constructs a fresh calcContext — fresh entry marker, fresh iterations map, full MaxCalcIterations budget (calc.go:896-900). The circular-reference control only exists within one context: the entry-exclusion marker and per-ref iteration budget are fields of that single context, and completion-based caching (formulaArgCache/calcRawCache) only ever stores results of evaluations that finish.
During a pure cycle no nested evaluation ever finishes, so nothing is ever cached to break the recursion, and each hop re-arms the entire budget. Two ordinary, Excel-legal constructs in an attacker-supplied workbook are enough:
A1 (dynamic array formula, ref A1:A1): _xlfn.ANCHORARRAY($B$1)B1 (dynamic array formula, ref B1:B1): _xlfn.ANCHORARRAY($A$1)→ CalcCellValue → calcCellValue → evalInfixExp → parseReference → cellResolver → … → ANCHORARRAY → CalcCellValue → … forever, ending in a fatal, unrecoverable Go runtime error: runtime: goroutine stack exceeds …-byte limit / fatal error: stack overflow. Go stack overflows cannot be recovered — the whole process aborts.
CalcCellValue calls.pivotTable.go:538, picture.go:985/1141, col.go:892), so a service that merely adds a pivot table or a picture over such a workbook dies.MaxCalcIterations is irrelevant because every hop gets a fresh budget.A standalone program (public API only) was provided to the maintainer by email (4-anchorarray-recursion): NewFile + SetCellFormula with FormulaOpts{Type: array, Ref: A1:A1 / B1:B1}, then CalcCellValue("Sheet1","A1"). On master ecd99d761fe0 (2026-09-08) the process aborts with fatal error: stack overflow; with the proposed patch the cycle terminates normally (CYCLE_TERMINATED) and existing calc tests pass.
An attacker ships a workbook containing the two formulas; any service that evaluates a formula over those cells — directly via CalcCellValue, or implicitly via AddPivotTable / AddPicture / auto-fit — aborts. Remote, unauthenticated, process-fatal, no configuration prevents it.
Evaluate spill-range cells through the current calculation context — fn.f.cellResolver(fn.ctx, …) instead of the exported CalcCellValue — so the entry check and iterations gate of the running calculation apply. cellResolver returns the typed value directly (dropping a string round-trip); an ArgEmpty → "" shim preserves the existing ToNumber behavior for empty spill cells, and a fresh-context fallback covers the legacy nil-ctx test paths. A complete patch has been provided to the maintainer.
Bạn đang dùng một trong các sản phẩm này? Quét site để biết có đang lộ phiên bản có lỗ hổng không.
Quét site miễn phí