| Gói / sản phẩm | Phiên bản bị ảnh hưởng | Phiên bản đã vá |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser | ≤ 1.11.0mọi phiên bản | |
| github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 | < 2.63.6 | 2.63.6 |
A low-privileged authenticated user of filebrowser (with create + delete permissions in their own isolated scope) can silently destroy share-link records belonging to any other user — including the administrator — by performing a legitimate DELETE on a file in their own directory whose logical path happens to be a byte-prefix of another user's stored share.Link.Path. The file contents of the victim are not exposed, but the victim's share links are irrevocably wiped.
resourceDeleteHandler in http/resource.go cleans up any share records that reference a deleted file by calling:
// http/resource.go
err = d.store.Share.DeleteWithPathPrefix(file.Path)
file.Path here is the logical path from the URL of the deleting user's request (e.g. /a), not the absolute filesystem path. It is passed as-is to the bolt backend:
// storage/bolt/share.go
func (s shareBackend) DeleteWithPathPrefix(pathPrefix string) error {
var links []share.Link
if err := s.db.Prefix("Path", pathPrefix, &links); err != nil {
return err
}
for _, link := range links {
err = errors.Join(err, s.db.DeleteStruct(&share.Link{Hash: link.Hash}))
}
return err
}
Why the design contradicts this behavior. share.Link carries a UserID field and the application elsewhere treats shares as per-user owned resources. shareDeleteHandler explicitly enforces link.UserID != d.user.ID && !d.user.Perm.Admin → 403. The file-deletion side-effect path is the only location that bypasses this rule.
Bạn đang dùng một trong các sản phẩm này? Quét site để biết có đang lộ phiên bản có lỗ hổng không.
Quét site miễn phí